Hang on while we load the rest of the page...
 
 

Voter ID Fight Heads to Commonwealth Court

Civil rights groups are seeking an injunction against the law that requires voters to have photo ID when they go to the polls in November.

 

Since its passage four months ago, Pennsylvania's Voter ID law has been a controversial topic throughout the state and on the Web. Previous stories about the issue on Patch have featured passionate replies from commenters on both sides.

"I find this to be a form of voter suppression targeting the elderly and disabled," user Franz Perl wrote. "These groups will have the hardest time getting to a DMV center, most do not drive."

Commenter Pete Krenshaw replied, "Bottom line – we need to make sure the integrity of the voting process is preserved regardless of political affiliation. So everyone who wants to vote has until November to obtain an acceptable form of ID. It's time to get it done."

Supporters and detractors of Pennsylvania's Voter ID law finally get their chance to make their arguments later today before Commonwealth Court Judge Robert Simpson. 

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) will represent 10 Pennsylvania citizens who say that the law deprives them of the right to cast a vote in November's general election, Philly.com reports. The ACLU will bring in witnesses that say they are unable to obtain the necessary photo identifications in time for the election.

In a report released earlier this month, the Pennsylvania State Department announced that more than 750,000 registered voters did not have a PennDOT issued photo ID, either a driver's license or non-driver's license. Critics argue that those numbers do not properly take into account voters that have other forms of identification.

Under the law, acceptable photo IDs include identification issued by the federal government or the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (a driver's license or non-driver's license photo ID), a valid U.S. passport that has not expired, a U.S. military ID, an employee photo ID issued by the federal, state, county or municipal government, photo IDs from an accredited public or private Pennsylvania college or university, or an ID card issued by a state care facility.

Last week, CBS Philly reported that the Pennsylvania State Department has also created a special, free ID card solely for the purpose of voting. Residents must travel to a state licensing facility and provide two proofs of residence, such as a utility bill, their date of birth and social security number. A birth certificate is not required. The information will be verified and photo ID card issued during the same visit, a State Department spokesperson told CBS.

Governor Tom Corbett signed the controversial voter ID bill in March, saying the law aims to prevent fraud at the ballot box. According to Huffington Post, the ACLU has included in its filing documents a stipulation agreement from state officials that there has been no prosecutions or investigations of voter fraud in the past or any direct knowledge of investigations in other states.

Philly.com says the state will argue that the law is not burdensome to the electorate and every effort has been made to ensure legal voters can get the documents they need. Regardless of the outcome of the case, it is extremely likely that it will be appealed to the state Supreme Court.

Related Topics: ACLU, Tom Corbett, commonwealth court, and voter ID

danny roturra

3:13 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

this is outrageous....how are the democrats supposed to win without dead people, illegal aliens, mobile voters, multiple votes, ballot stuffing, coercion , voter intimidation, unregistered voters and such...it ain't right

Reply

pruckels

3:36 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Funny enough, Danny Roturra, there isn't a single reported instance of vote fraud in the state. If you want to bring up coercion and voter intimidation, this "law" has all that in spades. It is a none too veiled attempt to disenfranchise voters in Pennsylvania being perpetrated by the GOP. Shame on them.

Reply

mj

3:44 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Maybe I'm missing the point, but I don't get how it's a bad thing to require ID? Especially for voting... how is that intimidating? I guess if it's against your beliefs to have your picture taken >.< Seriously, though, reported fraud or not, I think it's a good thing to keep people accountable. Especially with something as dirty as politics ^.<

Reply
Comment_arrow

Red Neck

4:49 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

I agree mj. The thing is, I don't think this new ID that the State Dept came up with is nothing more than a "house of mirrors". Without a birth certificate anyone could be anyone. Let's not forget that a man can be elected President of the United States without producing a b.c. until after he/her is elected. Do you want to vote in Nov. then prepare for now and get a legal Pa. I.D.

Bill

4:15 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Went to the UD library with my daughter who forgot her Library "ID" card. They wouldn't allow her to check out a book because she did not have a picture ID to prove who she was. Even though they knew who she was, and I was with her to also verify her identity they would not allow her the book. I had to pay $3.00 for a new library card which she didn't need an picture ID for. Where is the ACLU???

Went to the doctors and had to give them my drivers license or else no service. Is the ACLU going to file suit against OBAMACARE when a picture ID is required?

Oh about Voter Fraud. Gov't sponsored multimillion $ ACORN was de-funded because of voter fraud. Let us not forget the Black Panthers voter intimidation filmed in Phila. and DOJ Holder refusal to prosecute.

I'm just saying

Reply

pruckels

4:47 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Fundamentally, I don't have a problem with having to show an ID when I vote. I already do it. The problem with this law is twofold: first, that it is being enacted such a short time prior to the election; and second, that the Republican leadership in PA has stated that the purpose of the law is to ensure a Republican victory in PA in November (citation: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77811.html).

Put a law like this in place that gives a considerable roll-out period, say two years, and it can work...not that any real fraud has taken place that needs to be prevented in the first place, but I'm trying to play along here. It is the second point that should give EVERY Pennsylvanian, Democrat or Republican, pause -- it is a clear and unadulterated case of one political party attempting to control the outcome of an election by denying persons eligible to vote the right to do so.

And doesn't that sound like voter fraud? It sure does to me. Be careful whose rights you are so willing to throw under the bus today, because tomorrow, those rights might be yours.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Bartman

9:33 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

So what you are saying is people without ID will vote Democrat? Why so?

Comment_arrow

pruckels

10:11 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

I said nothing of the sort. Your reading comprehension leaves something to be desired. However, I'll play along. Yes, the Republicans know very well that these voter ID laws will have a more significant impact on voters who tend to vote Democratic. Yes, in my opinion, these tactics are being used in place of having an actual platform in order to attempt to win the election, by reducing the numbers of people who have historically voted for the Democratic candidate. The elderly, African-Americans, and urban and rural poor are among the groups that will be the most affected.

Feodor Tiorlenko

9:14 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

The Commonwealth has submitted that voter fraud has never been investigated or prosecuted.

Never is a very long time.

The Commonwealth has submitted that there is no reason to believe voter fraud has ever occurred in Pennsylvania. Further the Commonwealth has submitted that there is no reason to believe that voter fraud would take place if there was no voter I.D. law.

Submitted? Yes, a brief to the Supreme Court, a stupulation to be exact, to the Court so those points would not be argued before the court.

ACORN??? Evidently fictional accounts according to the Commonwealth.

Voter fraud is irrational because it is already illegal, with serious penalties.

So as individuals continue to make examples of borrowing library books, buying cigarettes, buying alcohol, watching porn movies, seeing a new doctor or getting a test at a hospital, the difference is that none of those things are constitutionally guaranteed rights.

You don't have to show ID in order to express yourself publicly because there if freedom of speech.

So folks, come up with relevant examples or stop trotting out the party line.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

11:16 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Well struck, Tom Bartman!

Yeah, do not listen to the claims that voter fraud never occurs. It simply isn't reported (If the fraud is pulled off successfully, how would anyone know?) or not prosecuted because it's too hard to prosecute successfully.

Instances have occurred and been prosecuted in other states.

Voter ID laws exist in 26 states, some as far back as 1990. And the US Supreme Court has upheld the concept of voter photo ID as not being an unreasonable burden (Indiana, 2008).

If the USSC decision was good enough for the ACA, then it should be good enough here!

Comment_arrow

Hal Dudash

2:46 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

I believe also that it is suspecious that this is being brought up by a Republican Governor less then four months before an election. On the other hand, just like Afphganistan or any thrid world country, you simply can't have elections until you have a census and a way of determining who you are. I worked in social work in Philly and some of my clients had more then one insurance card in their wallets. On the other hand, how many driver's licences facilities are there in West Philly? If the gov. wants ID's he needs to ensure they are easily gotten to.

pruckels

10:02 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

And all of the "sources" are Republican operatives. Yawn. Oh, and WND has a known, very strong, right-wing bias.

Reply

Feodor Tiorlenko

10:35 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

You will have to read the stipulation filed by the Commonwealth yesterday to the Supreme Court. yesterday. Yes yesterday.

So you can list whatever articles you choose. The Commonwealth has conceded and stipulated that voter fraud has never been investigated nor prosecuted. Never.

Read it. It was just yesterday.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Marc L.

11:24 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

...which is where they're passing a new voter ID law.

Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

11:32 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Point being, it does happen. And Pennsylvania is not immune. I believe - along with a lot of other people - that it has happened here, just hasn't been prosecuted.

Smedley

11:58 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

The Republicans are resorting to these tactics because they are loosing voters. And let me say I am not a Democrat. Voter Fraud happens alright. It's done by machine now. Right here in Montgomery County we vote on Sequoia Advantage voting machines. These machines have been dis-allowed in most states including New Jersey because they are not secure. Check out the film "Uncounted - The new math of American Elections".

Reply

Bill

12:32 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Let me see. Pa never any voter fraud?
WOW, as corrupt as Philly is. I'm sure glad that Philly politicians didn't turn to the "Vote early and often" philosophy like the Chicago political machine.

Voter fraud has occurred throughout voting history. That’s why billionaire WH puppet master George Sorros bought the Spanish Co. that has the contract to count the mail-in presidential ballots. Who said of the purchase, “It doesn’t matter who votes. It matters who counts them”.

I'm glad that our state is being proactive. Especially since what has happened in the last two elections in other states (NV). I guess they might have decided to ensure that only Americans/Pennsylvanians were eligible to vote. Maybe they just wanted to ensure voting integrity because this administration's "Open Boarders Policy" has given the US/Pennsylvania a massive influx of illegal aliens (unknown voters) who are being used like pawns for political gains (Executive Order). Maybe they just want to make sure that PA doesn't undergo a fraud investigation because all eyes are going to be on PA as a swing state in the election. Maybe they want a vote in America to mean more than a worthless vote in Russia, Iran, or 90% of the "Democratic" voting world.

Reply

Bill

12:32 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

As far as a two year voter program. What? This is America we can get anything done especially a fair and adequate voter plan. With >14% true unemployment we have the labor power. Don’t forget after the destruction of Dec 7 America had an operational fleet defending the Pacific against it's enemies within weeks.

Oh and in response to "You don't have to show ID in order to express yourself publicly because there if freedom of speech". Not so, just released “NSA whistleblowers: Government spying on every single American”. http://rt.com/usa/news/nsa-whistleblower-binney-drake-978/

Borrowing library books ... trotting out the party lines. I spoke the truth not party lines. The truth hurts I’m not affiliated with any party only seeking the truth because the truth we keep you FREE.

PS: pruckels…”The elderly, African-Americans, and urban and rural poor are among the groups that will be the most affected”. Find out the truth. Please go see the movie, this Friday only, AMC Warrington “Runaway Slave”. Further info http://www.runawayslavemovie.com/. You won’t be sorry.
Peace

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christine Whalen

11:25 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Bill, have you seen this movie? Where did you hear about it? It looks like propaganda. The real slavery of today is Debt. Low wages, high cost of living, benefits that are disappearing. This movie is trying to distract the public from the real truth and lay the blame where it doesn't belong. For decades, there has been a huge effort to get the middle class to vote against their own economic interest and it has worked, the nations wealth is being funneled up to the richest 1%. It time for the middle class to realize what is happening, hold on to our right to vote and use it to further the economic interests of the middle class and the less fortunate.
BTW, the 400 wealthiest people own 50% of the nations wealth. That's equal to what 150 million people own. inequality has NEVER be vast in the USA and democracy can't survive with this much inequality.

Comment_arrow

Christine Whalen

11:50 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

why do you bring up the NSA spying thing with this topic? Of course this is something we should all be very worried about, but i don't see how it relates to this discussion.

On a side note, the NSA and it's spying program where started by the Bush administration. Using 9/11 as a means to start spying on all Americans. We have had other rights taken from us. We are falling into an Oligarchy. The middle class needs to stop this before it is to late.

Joseph Finnick

8:35 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

99.99% of voter fraud that is carried out is done on a level that would not be stopped by the voter ID law (in other words it isn't people knowingly voting in a fraudulent manner, it is people who are running elections committing the fraud) and most of the remainder of that is done by accident (people accidentally sending in absentee ballots for others). This is why cases across the US and especially in PA are next to non-existent for voter impersonation (people knowingly fraudulently voting). The voter ID law is simply a red herring to pretend that something is being done about voter fraud when really they are stopping people from voting which is especially a shame when Americans should be fighting the absurd political apathy that has been running rampant in our country for decades.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joseph Finnick

8:50 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Also the law is expected to cost PA $12 million which can be much better spent.

Feodor Tiorlenko

8:53 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Voter fraud in Pennsylvania? Never investigated nor prosecuted according to the attorney general's office.

No incidents. Fictional accounts including those in this blog.

Voter fraud? It's always been illegal with very serious penalties. That's why it doesn't occur.

Reply

Betty Smith

9:05 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

I am not sure whether any of you are aware of the list that was put out by the state of individuals of both parties whose name on the photo i.d. (driver's license) does not match the name on the voter's registration. There are over 100 in my Ward and District. For instance, the First name on your birth cerificate and driver's license is spelled Shanna but you have spelled it Shana your whole life and that is how it is on your voter registration where you have voted for twenty years or more. Should everyone mail in a change of name form to Montgomery County? Check yours to be sure that they are the same. The rules now say that you will have to fill out a provisional ballot in November. This is another attempt to limit the number of people able to vote in November.

Reply

pruckels

9:07 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Having received a letter from Secretary of State Carol Aichele yesterday (one that I'm sure that every other registered voter in the state received), it had me wondering what the dollar cost of this law was...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Betty Smith

10:05 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Maybe they sent them in alpha order and I'll get mine today. What did it say? And did it deal with those registered voters whose name on the i.d. doesn't match with the name on the registration form. Should we tell those registered voters to re-register?

Brian D. Bigelow

9:11 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Voter fraud is rampant in Philadelphia. They actually had a polling location that had more votes than registered voters for that location.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Betty Smith

9:18 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Can you tell us which voting location that was?

Comment_arrow

Joseph Finnick

9:20 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

That is not voter impersonation. The voter ID law would have no effect on that type of fraud because it has nothing to do with individuals voting fraudulently as that is obviously fraud carried out by the people running the election (if it is true, which, to a degree, I believe it is). If you want to combat fraud at the polling locations than you need more oversight of them.

Comment_arrow

Brian D. Bigelow

9:38 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Betty: There was a story in the Daily News last week. It was about a Republican City Councilman on a " bipatisan" committee investigating voter fraud in the city.

Comment_arrow

Christine Whalen

11:32 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

That is evidence of voting machine fraud. the machine we vote on can be hacked and the votes changes. we need a paper trail.

Robert Willi

11:57 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

What I don't understand is why can't you use your voter registration card you get in the mail when you register to vote? Isn't that why the card was mailed to you so that you would show that at you polling place?
I agree with what someone stated earlier that if you are going to do the photo id, shouldn't it have been phased in over a two year period? I think then people may not have been so up in arms over it because then they would have had enough time to get the proper documents to get their photo id.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christine Whalen

1:35 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Even if they gave 2 years to implement the photo ID, it's still impeding on our rights. We have to hold on to our rights. Bottom line, this IS a concerted effort to suppress the vote and that is bad for democracy. Here's a quote from – Conservative activist Paul Weyrich, at a 1980 training session for Christian conservatives “I don't want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of the people. They never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.”

Comment_arrow

Stephen Eickhoff

2:06 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

Ah yes, the conservative heavyweight Paul Weyrich. I'm sure you can find some other outdated quotes from other dead extremists on top of that. How about David Duke? Or some other figurehead who never held elected office or controlled multinational corporations or shadow orgs like George Soros?

Comment_arrow

Christine Whalen

2:13 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

Stephen, he start the Heritage foundation. they have been behind the conservative movement. they have think tanks and all they do is figure ways to win at all costs. they lie, cheat and steal to win.

Smedley

12:55 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

The voting machines we have in Montgomery County cannot be checked to see if it counted the votes right. Once you push the button on the machine to count the vote, it cannot recount them. It will only give you the number it came up with the first time. There is no way to tell if the machine really counted the vote the same way people voted on it.

Reply

Smedley

1:00 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Christine I agree with you we need a Voter Verified Paper Ballot.

Reply

Frankie DeCat

1:47 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

How about a voter IQ test before they are allowed to vote ? Look what the blind liberal democrats have done to our beautiful suburbs. How many terms are the idiots going to give career Philadelphia politician Allyson Schwartz ? Does she even know where Mongomery County is ?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian D. Bigelow

2:06 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

You are dead on Frankie. Allyson Schwartz is the biggest fraud the 13th congressional disctrict has seen since.............Joe ( never stop running for something) Hoefell

Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

2:26 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Seriously, I doubt Allyson could find any Montgomery County township west of Abington if she tried. I can recall seeing her at exactly ONE Horsham event, and that was tout Fast Eddie's plan for JRB Willow Grove. Since then, nada!

She always looks East, but only when she's facing South, if you get my drift.

Vote Joe Rooney!!
http://crankymanslawn.com/2012/02/06/joe-rooney-for-pennsylvanias-13th-congressional-district/

Comment_arrow

Roman Gabriel

3:01 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Frankie, Brian & Mike, you guys have it right. Allyson Schwartz career Philadelphia politician, liar and Obamacare architect. If only she had a compass ( or GPS ), then maybe she could find Montgomery County. She is why we need to stop the voter fraud that is running wild in Pa.

Betty Smith

5:19 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

I have no clue what problem you have with Allyson Schwartz. She was State Senator in Montgomery County before she ran for the House. The lines were drawn to include parts of Philadelphia (mostly in the northeast). She lives in Abington, which you may note is in Montgomery County. I think she knows where Montgomery County is.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

8:44 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

No, Betty, Allyson knows where eastern (i.e. Liberal) Montgomery County is. She hasn't ventured west of Huntington Pike without Rendell or Bob Casey holding her hand or at least telling her what to say. (Well, maybe not Casey telling her. I don't think he can even talk from what very little we hear from him.)

John Monaghan

6:48 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Not true Betty....Allyson Schwartz was a State Senator in Philadelphia. She moved into Jenkintown when she decided to run for Congress. Among other things, she was notably absent in 2010 when other members of Congress were responding to constituent concerns about Obamacare. Also, famously, she came late and left early at a candidate's night in Meadowbrook.

Reply

Smedley

10:05 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

They're all career politicians both Republican and Democrat. In Pa. less than 3% of our representatives ever leave office on their own. The only thing they care about is getting elected the next time around. I agree Allyson Schwartz is worthless but so is Stewart Greenleaf and all of our other so called representatives. Once they're in you can't get rid of them. How about some term limits!

Reply

Feodor Tiorlenko

7:50 am on Friday, July 27, 2012

Dopes here took a wrong turn on the Voter ID issue.

The law as passed is voter supression plain and simple. The imbecilic comments by "Hatboro Mike" Shortall and others demonstrates the lack of intelligence and thought on this issue.

Were it not for attempts by the GOP to steal the election, this would not be a topic. Can't win an election on merit??? Make up nonsense about "voter fraud".

Problem for you is that according to the PA state attorney general's off, "voter fraud has never been investigated nor prosecuted in Pennsylvania."

Try to stay on topic. Lacking facts, I know that's tough for you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

9:29 am on Friday, July 27, 2012

imbecilic comment = did not agree with Feodor ... Oh well, at least it's a short step up from your normal commentary!

Here's YOUR problem ... The United States Supreme Court upheld Indiana's photo voter ID laws by 6-3 (i.e. BIPARTISAN agreement), and went so far as to state that such requirements are not an unreasonable burden or obstruction to voting. (I'm still trying to figure out what's so dramatically different about the Pennsylvania Constitution that makes this any less a winning argument than it was in the USSC. Maybe you can help me there, Feodor?!?)

And here's a FACT you can chew on ... SInce the law became effective in March 2012, only 2800 or so Pennsylvanians, who needed the "reasonable" photo ID, have bothered to obtain them. That's the other very real problem for those counting on high voter turnouts - but only in certain, very specific parts of the state - this November. The people they count on just don't care enough about the RESPONSIBILITY of voting to bother being even reasonably responsible.

Voter fraud is real. Examples have been posted of individuals who have voted in the name of others. Maybe it hasn't been prosecuted in PA, but it's happened elsewhere. Failure to prosecute does not equate to "never happened here"!

Comment_arrow

Brian D. Bigelow

9:35 am on Friday, July 27, 2012

Hey Feodor, your a typical liberal douchbag. You have very selective reading skills. Because voter fraud has never been prosecuted, doesn't mean it that it doesn't exist. I'm fairly certain "Hatboro Mike" can defend himself with out my help, but your just an idiot. There was just a big story last week in the Daily news about the voter fraud going on in Phila.. The worst case was the polling location that had more votes than registered voters for that location. I would like to know your opinion on the Black Panthers who with clubs in hand were videod intimidating voters in philly in 2008. Eric ( racist) Holder our incompetent Attorney General just looked the other way.Why ? Shouldnt that be investigated ? When your throwing out the word "dopes" as a discription for conerned Americans you have gone to far.

Comment_arrow

Joseph Finnick

11:00 am on Friday, July 27, 2012

The US Supreme Court decision was hardly bipartisan (it was actually along party lines) and even the Supreme Court admitted, though they thought it was constitutional, that voter ID laws are a way to win for the Republicans (due to people not being able to vote). Look only to the PA House Majority leader Turzai who admitted that the voter ID law would allow Romney to win PA.

In the end: Have there been cases of voter fraud? Yes. Would these cases have been helped by a voter ID law? No because there are no documented cases of in person voter impersonation fraud (the only type of fraud the voter ID law would stop). Is this a grab by the Republican party to stop people who historically voted Democrat from voting so they can win? I think so.

Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

11:17 am on Friday, July 27, 2012

Well, technically you're right, Joe. Stevenson was appointed by a Republican, but he votes LIBERAL on just about everything. I'll retract "bipartisan" in favor of "bilateral".

Fact is, it was a stronger decision than was the 5-4 squeaker on the ACA.

And there are examples of prosecuted individual voter fraud occuring in other states. It's not much of a stretch to coming to the conclusion that it could, would, or already has occurred here, regardless of the lack of prosecution.

In my humble opinion, any effort needed to further secure the sanctity of the vote AND - if nothing else - preventing voter fraud in the future sounds damn reasonable to me.

Comment_arrow

Joseph Finnick

11:41 am on Friday, July 27, 2012

I respectfully disagree. The amount of cases even throughout the entire US over the last few decades have been so few that you could probably count them on your one hand. This is also taking into account that some of those were just accidents (such as the one claimed by the Minn. group). The risk (5 years in prison and a hefty fine) outweighs the benefit (a single vote more for your candidate/s) which is part of the reason why it doesn't happen. I believe that this is a costly ($11 million- sorry I misstated earlier that it was $12 million) answer searching for a problem.

In my opinion the purity of the vote also has to do with the unfettered right to vote and the voter ID law tramples all over that.

Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

12:33 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

Hard to imagine one using "purity" and "unfettered" in the same sentence when describing what's important about the the vote..

Comment_arrow

Joseph Finnick

12:47 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

To each his own, but I do not have a problem with keeping it relatively easy to vote so that each person may vote without unnecessary restrictions and hoops to jump through. We already have such a problem with voter turnout, I do not see any reason to make it worse.

Roman Gabriel

10:12 am on Friday, July 27, 2012

If you want proof of voter fraud, all you have to do is look at the success of career Philadelphia politician Allyson Schwartz. There cant be that many stupid citizens in the 13th congressional district. Who is she ? And when will she make her first ever appearance in Montgomery County ?

Reply

pruckels

10:29 am on Friday, July 27, 2012

Wow. It's very telling to see which commentors resort to mudslinging, namecalling, and being unable to back up their assertions with citations -- and I won't even go into spelling and grammar. Also, Brian, Holder wasn't AG in 2008.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian D. Bigelow

10:49 am on Friday, July 27, 2012

Very keen observation pruckles. Eric (racist) Holder wasnt AG in 2008, but he was absolutely responsible for the fact that no investigation ever took place. He was way to busy suing the citizens of Arizona for the crime of protecting there own borders.

Michael J.

11:01 am on Friday, July 27, 2012

I am amazed at all the ruckus about voter ID. I have to give ID to get spray paint at Pep Boys. Show ID for cigarettes. If you don't have ID, how are people getting assistance? If all these people who are complaining, would just get together and HELP those who need ID for what ever reason, It would solve the problem.

Reply

pruckels

11:51 am on Friday, July 27, 2012

Put into proper perspective, the number of people potentially disenfranchized in Philadelphia alone outnumbers the number of actual, proven voter fraud casese by several orders of magnitude. Again, I don't disagree with the need to show ID in order to vote. I do disagree with the spirit behind the law (to unabashedly "deliver" PA to Romney) as well as the timing of it, and I would feel the same way if the Democrats were enacting some legislation that would disenfranchise Republicans. Democracy's cornerstone is free and fair elections, without external influence.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mallison Schwartz

12:01 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

Can't we go back to talking about the invisible, incompetent, millionaire, career Phila politician, Obama-care architect, wicked witch of the left, Allyson Schwartz ?

Christine Whalen

1:14 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

Here's an article for you guy all concerned about voter fraud. this is who is committing it. http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2011/06/did-mitt-romney-commit-voter-fraud

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

1:43 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

That's quite funny. Even an organization as liberal as Mother Jones is could recognize the fact that the author of the article has a gay/anti-Mormon ax to grind, bigger than the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, when it comes to Mitt Romney, and no move has been made by any authority to press Romney on his voting habits.

On the other hand, it worth noting that - if Mr. Romney had in fact been voting fraudulently - the type of voter ID requirement to be used in Pennsylvania, which would include his legal address of residency, would have prevented the "fraud"!!

Thanks!

Smedley

8:53 am on Sunday, July 29, 2012

How about if we start talking about the invisible, incompetent, millionaire, career politician, wicked warlock of the right, Stewart Greenleaf ?

Reply

Leave a comment

 
 
 
 

Your town. Mobilized.

Download Patch for iPhone or Patch Places for Android.

Learn more 

Own a local business?

Stay in touch with customers by claiming your free Patch listing.

Learn more 

Advertise on Patch

Build community trust in your local brand with game-changing tools for any budget.

Learn how